92 S.E.2d 239 (Ga.App. 1956), 36110, Arnold v. Chupp

Citation: 92 S.E.2d 239, 93 Ga.App. 583

Opinion Judge: TOWNSEND, Judge.

Party Name: J. H. ARNOLD v. Teddy C. CHUPP, by Next Friend.

Attorney: (b) As between one relying on the custom, and a third party injured thereby, evidence of a custom of giving to motor traffic signals mechanically installed on vehicles a meaning different from that provided by law is inadmissible where the meaning attributed to the signal by custom is in direct c...

Judge Panel: GARDNER, P. J., and CARLISLE, J., concur.

Case Date: Wednesday March 14, 1956

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

92 S.E.2d 239 (Ga.App. 1956), 36110, Arnold v. Chupp

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 13 S.E. 459 (Ga. 1891), Mayfield v. Savannah, G. & N.A.R. Co.
Georgia - 30 S.E. 959 (Ga. 1898), Epps v. Buckmaster
Georgia - 24 S.E.2d 810 (Ga.App. 1943), 29881, Ergle v. Davidson
Georgia - 90 S.E.2d 622 (Ga.App. 1955), 35900, Shirley Cloak & Dress Co. v. Arnold
Georgia - 92 S.E.2d 580 (Ga.App. 1956), 35994, Glens Falls Indem. Co. v. Canal Ins. Co.