169 Cal.App.3d 24, B003190, Bell Commuity Redevelopment Agency v. Woosley

Citation: 169 Cal.App.3d 24, 214 Cal.Rptr. 788

Opinion Judge: [12] Hastings

Party Name: Bell Commuity Redevelopment Agency v. Woosley

Attorney: [7] J. Robert Flandrick, Burke, Williams & Sorensen and James Warren Beebe for Plaintiff and Appellant and Petitioner. [8] Jones, Hall, Hill & White, Robert G. Auwberry, Herbert M. Weiser, Lance E. Garber, Weiser, Kane, Ballmer & Bankman, Steven H. Goldfarb, Lee C. Rosenthal, Goldfarb & Lipman, T...

Case Date: Friday June 07, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

169 Cal.App.3d 24, B003190, Bell Commuity Redevelopment Agency v. Woosley

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 183 Cal. 273, S. F. 9260, City and County of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident Commission
California - 17 Cal.2d 707, 16293, Los Angeles v. Superior Court
California - 61 Cal.2d 21, 26751, In re Bunker Hill Urban Renewal Project 1B of CommunityRedevelopment Agency of City of Los Angeles
California - 21 Cal.3d 255, 30827, Redevelopment Agency v. County of San Bernardino
California - 38 Cal.3d 100, 31861, Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. Martin

See all quotations