38 Cal.3d 100, 31861, Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. Martin

Citation: 38 Cal.3d 100, 211 Cal.Rptr. 133, 695 P.2d 220

Opinion Judge: [10] Mosk

Party Name: Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. Martin

Attorney: [6] Michael B. Montgomery, James Warren Beebe, John G. Perenchio, Kindel & Anderson and Steven P. Rice for Petitioner. [7] Jones, Hall, Hill & White, Robert G. Auwbrey, Helm, Budinger & Lemieux, Wayne K. Lemieux, Steven H. Goldfarb, Lee C. Rosenthal, Goldfarb & Lipman, Joseph E. Coomes, Jr., T. B...

Case Date: Thursday February 28, 1985

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

38 Cal.3d 100, 31861, Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. Martin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 21 Cal.3d 255, 30827, Redevelopment Agency v. County of San Bernardino
California - 22 Cal.3d 208, 23849, Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization
California - 31 Cal.3d 197, 31403, Los Angeles County Transporation Com. v. Richmond
California - 32 Cal.3d 47, 24177, City and County of San Francisco v. Farrell
California - 108 Cal.App.3d 656, 18866, Mills v. County of Trinity

See all quotations