169 A. 41 (Conn. 1933), Bishop v. City of Meriden

Citation: 169 A. 41, 117 Conn. 499

Opinion Judge: MALTBIE, Chief Justice.

Party Name: BISHOP v. CITY OF MERIDEN.

Attorney: William L. Beers and George E. Beers, both of New Haven, for plaintiff. Denis T. O'Brien, Jr., and Robert M. Dowling, both of Meriden, for defendant.

Judge Panel: Argued before MALTBIE, C.J., and HAINES, HINMAN, BANKS, and AVERY, JJ.

Case Date: November 07, 1933

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

169 A. 41 (Conn. 1933), Bishop v. City of Meriden

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 110 A. 557 (Conn. 1920), City of Norwalk v. Norwalk Inv. Co.
Connecticut - 127 A. 508 (Conn. 1925), Keller v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut - 135 A. 37 (Conn. 1926), McIsaac v. Hale
Connecticut - 140 A. 814 (Conn. 1928), Woodward v. City of New Haven
Connecticut - 143 A. 245 (Conn. 1928), Town of Stamford v. Vuono

See all quotations