162 A. 846 (Conn. 1932), Bishop v. City of Meriden

Citation: 162 A. 846, 115 Conn. 624

Opinion Judge: MALTBIE, C.J.

Party Name: BISHOP v. CITY OF MERIDEN (two cases).

Attorney: Cornelius J. Danaher, Denis T. O'Brien, Jr., and Robert M. Dowling, all of Meriden, for appellant. George E. Beers, of New Haven, and Irving G. Smith, of Meriden, for appellees.

Judge Panel: Argued before MALTBIE, C.J., and HAINES, HINMAN, BANKS, and AVERY, JJ.

Case Date: Tuesday November 08, 1932

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

162 A. 846 (Conn. 1932), Bishop v. City of Meriden

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 140 A. 814 (Conn. 1928), Woodward v. City of New Haven
Connecticut - 159 A. 289 (Conn. 1932), Bishop v. City of Meriden
Connecticut - 18 A. 102 (Conn. 1889), Hough v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut - 34 A. 183 (Conn. 1895), Cook v. City of Ansonia
Connecticut - 72 A. 646 (Conn. 1909), Bishop v. City of New Haven

See all quotations