155 Cal.App.3d 405, 54387, Cochran v. Herzog Engraving Co.

Citation: 155 Cal.App.3d 405, 205 Cal.Rptr. 1

Opinion Judge: [11] Scott

Party Name: Cochran v. Herzog Engraving Co.

Attorney: [7] Abramson & Bianco, Abramson & Smith, William B. Smith, Albert R. Abramson and Daniel U. Smith for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel, Robert M. Tobin and H. R. Lloyd, Jr., for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. [9] Douglas Dang, City Attorney, and Peter W. Ols...

Case Date: April 11, 1984

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

155 Cal.App.3d 405, 54387, Cochran v. Herzog Engraving Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 36 Cal.2d 196, 17777, City & Co. of S. F. v. County of San Mateo
California - 64 Cal.2d 229, 22196, Heieck and Moran v. City of Modesto
California - 16 Cal.3d 834, 30460, Williams v. Horvath
California - 18 Cal.3d 901, 23366, Morris v. County of Marin
California - 100 Cal.App.3d 648, 44644, Duarte v. City of San Jose

See all quotations