36 Cal.2d 196, 17777, City & Co. of S. F. v. County of San Mateo

Citation: 36 Cal.2d 196, 222 P.2d 860

Opinion Judge: [11] Shenk

Party Name: City & Co. of S. F. v. County of San Mateo

Attorney: [7] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and A. Dal Thomson, Public Utilities Counsel, for Appellant. [8] Gilbert D. Ferrell, District Attorney (San Mateo), Louis B. Dematteis and John A. Bruning, Assistant District Attorneys, Keith Sorensen, Civil Deputy District Attorney, and A. S. Whitmore, Associate ...

Case Date: Friday October 20, 1950

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

36 Cal.2d 196, 17777, City & Co. of S. F. v. County of San Mateo

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 180 Cal. 18, L. A. 4600, San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California - 182 Cal. 171, L. A. 5332, City of Pasadena v. County of Los Angeles
California - 186 Cal. 183, Sac. 2935, Turlock Irrigation District v. White
California - 198 Cal. 405, L. A. 8411, Luce v. City of San Diego
California - 17 Cal.2d 814, 16074, San Francisco v. San Mateo

See all quotations

36 Cal.2d 196, 17777, City &amp; Co. of S. F. v. County of San Mateo

36 Cal.2d 196, 17777, City & Co. of S. F. v. County of San Mateo