142 Cal.App.3d 957, 49986, Schrier v. San Mateo County Employees' Retirement Assn.

Citation: 142 Cal.App.3d 957, 191 Cal.Rptr. 421

Opinion Judge: [10] Haning

Party Name: Schrier v. San Mateo County Employees' Retirement Assn.

Attorney: [7] Christopher D. Burdick and Carroll, Burdick & McDonough for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Keith C. Sorenson, District Attorney, and Thomas Daniel Daly, Deputy District Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: May 12, 1983

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

142 Cal.App.3d 957, 49986, Schrier v. San Mateo County Employees' Retirement Assn.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 20 Cal.2d 684, 5408, Sacramento M. U. District v. Pacific G. & E. Co.
California - 58 Cal.2d 618, 20829, Bilyeu v. State Emp. Retirement System
California - 11 Cal.3d 28, 30009, Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.
California - 21 Cal.3d 650, 30823, Palos Verdes Faculty Assn. v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified Sch. Dist.
California - 3 Cal.3d 678, 29776, Mannheim v. Superior Court

See all quotations