117 Cal.App.3d 132, 48842, Hamilton v. State Bd. of Education

Citation: 117 Cal.App.3d 132, 172 Cal.Rptr. 748

Opinion Judge: [11] Barry-deal

Party Name: Hamilton v. State Bd. of Education

Attorney: [7] Ring, Athey, Ginocchio, Lane & Ring and August J. Ginocchio for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] George Deukmejian, Attorney General, Charlton G. Holland and John Davidson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent. [9] McCutcheon, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, John W. Fowler and Robert ...

Case Date: March 20, 1981

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

117 Cal.App.3d 132, 48842, Hamilton v. State Bd. of Education

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 16 Cal.3d 30, 23322, People ex rel. Younger v. Superior Court
California - 23 Cal.3d 152, 20595, In re Rojas
California - 24 Cal.3d 836, 23823, California Mfrs. Assn. v. Public Utilities Com.
California - 8 Cal.3d 247, 7924, Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors
California - 42 Cal.App.3d 328, 33156, Certificated Employees Council v. Monterey Peninsula Unified Sch. Dist.

See all quotations