142 Cal.App.3d 1040, 53715, Lundak v. Board of Retirement

Citation: 142 Cal.App.3d 1040, 191 Cal.Rptr. 446

Opinion Judge: [10] White

Party Name: Lundak v. Board of Retirement

Attorney: [7] Norback & DuRard, Norback, DuRard, Calton, Gangemi & Schuler and Ernest H. Norback for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Keith C. Sorenson and James P. Fox, District Attorneys, and Thomas Daniel Daly, Deputy District Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday May 17, 1983

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

142 Cal.App.3d 1040, 53715, Lundak v. Board of Retirement

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 214 Cal. 241, S. F. 13019, Buckley v. Roche
California - 64 Cal.2d 441, 7693, Gorman v. Cranston
California - 10 Cal.3d 222, 22990, Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.
California - 11 Cal.3d 28, 30009, Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.
California - 211 Cal.App.2d 292, 10415, Jorgensen v. Cranston

See all quotations