87 Cal.App.3d 392, 16691, De Puy v. Board of Retirement

Citation: 87 Cal.App.3d 392, 150 Cal.Rptr. 791

Opinion Judge: [10] Cologne

Party Name: De Puy v. Board of Retirement

Attorney: [7] Donald L. Clark, County Counsel, and Yves A. Hebert, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Carlson & Thiessen and Robert G. Carlson for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: November 30, 1978

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

87 Cal.App.3d 392, 16691, De Puy v. Board of Retirement

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 29 Cal.2d 79, 19627, Colonial Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.
California - 11 Cal.3d 28, 30009, Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.
California - 211 Cal.App.2d 292, 10415, Jorgensen v. Cranston
California - 255 Cal.App.2d 409, 788, Pathe v. City of Bakersfield
California - 53 Cal.App.3d 540, 37461, Minor v. Sonoma County Employees Retirement Bd.

See all quotations