139 Cal.App.3d 152, 65260, Shank v. County of Los Angeles

Citation: 139 Cal.App.3d 152, 188 Cal.Rptr. 644

Opinion Judge: [10] Lillie

Party Name: Shank v. County of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Rowen, Swanson, Rose & Simon and Robert G. Rassp for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Keenan & Tobin, Horvitz & Greines, Ellis J. Horvitz and David S. Ettinger for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday January 18, 1983

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

139 Cal.App.3d 152, 65260, Shank v. County of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 66 Cal.2d 24, 7771, Viles v. State
California - 66 Cal.2d 468, 29026, Tammen v. San Diego County
California - 12 Cal.3d 447, 23055, City of San Jose v. Superior Court
California - 6 Cal.3d 353, 29924, Fredrichsen v. City of Lakewood
California - 101 Cal.App.2d 558, 14534, Cruise v. City & County of San Francisco

See all quotations