136 Cal.App.3d 1009, 61290, Bell v. Hummel

Citation: 136 Cal.App.3d 1009, 186 Cal.Rptr. 688

Opinion Judge: [10] O'brien

Party Name: Bell v. Hummel

Attorney: [7] Lewis Metzinger & Associates for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, R. Gaylord Smith and Nancy N. Potter for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday October 26, 1982

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

136 Cal.App.3d 1009, 61290, Bell v. Hummel

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 135 Cal. 666, L. A. 989, Goldtree v. Spreckels
California - 29 Cal.2d 825, 19576, Estate of Hultin
California - 4 Cal.2d 120, 15355, Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior Court
California - 29 Cal.3d 781, 31334, Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.
California - 6 Cal.3d 176, 29865, Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand

See all quotations