114 Cal.App.3d 967, 45631, Faitz v. Ruegg

Citation: 114 Cal.App.3d 967, 171 Cal.Rptr. 149

Opinion Judge: [10] Taylor

Party Name: Faitz v. Ruegg

Attorney: [7] Henry J. Faitz, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel and Jack T. Holland for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: January 21, 1981

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

114 Cal.App.3d 967, 45631, Faitz v. Ruegg

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 132 Cal.App. 48, Civ. 8790, Finnerty v. Cummings
California - 196 Cal.App.2d 130, 25079, Morningred v. Golden State Co.
California - 42 Cal.App.2d 144, 11166, Bauman V.city and County of San Francisco
California - 65 Cal.App.2d 753, 7024, Shriver v. Silva
California - 61 Cal.App.3d 102, 22239, People v. Manson

See all quotations