129 S.E.2d 323 (S.C. 1963), 18018, Durant v. Palmetto Chevrolet Co.

Citation: 129 S.E.2d 323, 241 S.C. 508

Opinion Judge: BRAILSFORD, Justice.

Party Name: William H. DURANT, Respondent, v. PALMETTO CHEVROLET COMPANY, Inc., Appellant.

Attorney: Messrs. Burroughs & Green, of Conway, for Appellant, cite: As to there being no breach of the existing warranty: 158 S.C. 112, 155 S.E. 268; 161 S.C. 40, 159 S.E. 461. As to where only one reasonable inference can be drawn from all of the testimony it becomes a question of law for the Court and n...

Case Date: January 22, 1963

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

129 S.E.2d 323 (S.C. 1963), 18018, Durant v. Palmetto Chevrolet Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 155 S.E. 268 (S.C. 1930), 12981, Black v. B.B. Kirkland Seed Co.
South Carolina - 180 S.E. 197 (S.C. 1935), 14073, Stevenson v. B. B. Kirkland Seed Co.
South Carolina - 48 S.E.2d 653 (S.C. 1948), 16086, Reliance Varnish Co. v. Mullins Lumber Co.
South Carolina - 94 S.E.2d 397 (S.C. 1956), 17205, Cannon v. Pulliam Motor Co.