94 S.E.2d 397 (S.C. 1956), 17205, Cannon v. Pulliam Motor Co.

Citation: 94 S.E.2d 397, 230 S.C. 131

Opinion Judge: OXNER, Justice.

Party Name: W. L. CANNON, Respondent, v. PULLIAM MOTOR COMPANY, Wilson Motor Company and Ford Motor Company, Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Robinson, McFadden & Dreher and T. Pou Taylor, of Columbia, for Appellants, cite: As to there being no proof that the appellants breached their obligations under the warranty in any respect: 117 S.C. 391, 109 S.E. 106; 161 S.C. 40, 159 S.E. 461; 280 F. 499; 105 S.C. 520, 90 S.E. 186; 63 A...

Case Date: Thursday September 20, 1956

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

94 S.E.2d 397 (S.C. 1956), 17205, Cannon v. Pulliam Motor Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 96 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1938), 8342, Ford Motor Co. v. Cullum
Alabama - 69 So.2d 295 (Ala.App. 1953), 6 Div. 536, Becker Roofing Co. v. Carroll
Georgia - 19 S.E.2d 430 (Ga.App. 1942), 29192, C. V. Hill & Co. v. Weinberg
Georgia - 62 S.E.2d 198 (Ga.App. 1950), 33198, Studebaker Corp. v. Nail
Indiana - 170 N.E. 101 (Ind.App. 1930), 13,492, Morris v. Trinkle

See all quotations