128 Cal.App.2d 277, 16011, Imperiale v. City & County of S. F.

Citation: 128 Cal.App.2d 277, 275 P.2d 569

Opinion Judge: [10] Kaufman

Party Name: Imperiale v. City & County of S. F.

Attorney: [7] Allen Spivock for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, Thomas M. O'Connor, Public Utilities Counsel, and Louis T. Kruger, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

Case Date: October 25, 1954

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

128 Cal.App.2d 277, 16011, Imperiale v. City & County of S. F.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 181 F.2d 375 (9th Cir. 1950), 12337, Department of W. & P. v. Okonite-Callender C. Co.
California - 185 Cal. 475, L. A. 6145, Engebretson v. City of San Diego
California - 210 Cal. 348, L. A. 10532, Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long Beach
California - 41 Cal.2d 623, 18818, Guidi v. State of California
California - 111 Cal.App.2d 579, 14817, Bertone v. City & County of S. F.

See all quotations

128 Cal.App.2d 277, 16011, Imperiale v. City &amp; County of S. F.

128 Cal.App.2d 277, 16011, Imperiale v. City & County of S. F.