113 Cal.App.2d 186, 15141, Mcguire & Hester v. City Etc. of S. F.

Citation: 113 Cal.App.2d 186, 247 P.2d 934

Opinion Judge: [10] Bray

Party Name: Mcguire & Hester v. City Etc. of S. F.

Attorney: [7] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and A. Dal Thomson, Public Utilities Counsel, for Appellant. [8] Gardiner Johnson and John A. Sproul for Respondent.

Case Date: September 24, 1952

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

113 Cal.App.2d 186, 15141, Mcguire & Hester v. City Etc. of S. F.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 38 F.2d 52 (2nd Cir. 1930), 112, Cranford Co. v. City of New York
Federal Cases - 134 F.2d 468 (9th Cir. 1943), 10168, City and County of San Francisco v. Transbay Const. Co.
Federal Cases - 181 F.2d 375 (9th Cir. 1950), 12337, Department of W. & P. v. Okonite-Callender C. Co.
California - 106 Cal. 566, 15698, Hopkins v. Contra Costa County
California - 185 Cal. 475, L. A. 6145, Engebretson v. City of San Diego

See all quotations

113 Cal.App.2d 186, 15141, Mcguire &amp; Hester v. City Etc. of S. F.

113 Cal.App.2d 186, 15141, Mcguire & Hester v. City Etc. of S. F.