123 A.2d 785 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), No. A--281, Barber v. Hohl

Citation: 123 A.2d 785, 40 N.J.Super. 526

Opinion Judge: Conford, J.A.D.

Party Name: THEODORE R. BARBER, ET UX, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HENRY D. HOHL, ET UX, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

Attorney: Mr. Vincent A. Grasso argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Hiering & Grasso, attorneys). Mr. Julius Robinson argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

Judge Panel: Goldmann, Freund and Conford.

Case Date: Wednesday June 27, 1956

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

123 A.2d 785 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), No. A--281, Barber v. Hohl

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 39 F.2d 512 (D.D.C. 1930), 4891, Wardman-Justice Motors, Inc. v. Petrie
California - 32 Cal.2d 791, 20585, Brewer v. Second Baptist Church
California - 35 Cal.2d 161, 21189, Finney v. Lockhart
Georgia - 42 S.E.2d 441 (Ga. 1947), 15698, Foster v. Sikes
North Carolina - 166 S.E. 391 (N.C. 1932), 414, Walker v. L.B. Price Mercantile Co.

See all quotations