115 Cal.App.3d 869, 18751, City of Sacramento v. Gemsch Investment Co.

Citation: 115 Cal.App.3d 869, 171 Cal.Rptr. 764

Opinion Judge: [10] Cecchettini

Party Name: City of Sacramento v. Gemsch Investment Co.

Attorney: [7] Memering & DeMers, Henry W. Crowle and Claudia J. Robinson for Cross-complainant and Appellant. [8] Panattoni, Westley, Farrell & Callahan, David E. Davies, Miller, Good & Ford and Richard E. Good for Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: February 11, 1981

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

115 Cal.App.3d 869, 18751, City of Sacramento v. Gemsch Investment Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 47 Cal.2d 337, 19514, Panopulos v. Maderis
California - 51 Cal.2d 127, 19977, City & County of S. F. v. Ho Sing
California - 13 Cal.3d 804, 30277, Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
California - 20 Cal.3d 578, 30737, American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court
California - 21 Cal.3d 322, 23596, Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-Kart

See all quotations