109 Cal.App.3d 625, 56243, Roberts v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 109 Cal.App.3d 625, 167 Cal.Rptr. 320

Opinion Judge: [10] Stephens

Party Name: Roberts v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Burt Pines, City Attorney, John T. Neville, Sr., Assistant City Attorney, and S. Thomas Todd and Daniel U. Smith, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Mohi & Glasman and Gary Mohi for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Friday August 22, 1980

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

109 Cal.App.3d 625, 56243, Roberts v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 40 Cal.2d 630, 22524, Sills v. Los Angeles Transit Lines
California - 9 Cal.2d 409, 15762, Herbert v. Lankershim
California - 165 Cal.App.2d 640, 23107, Gibson v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc.
California - 208 Cal.App.2d 222, 6780, Whaley v. Jansen
California - 227 Cal.App.2d 675, 20736, Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists, Local 1304, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO

See all quotations