239 Cal.App.2d 487, 22157, Trejo v. Maciel

Citation: 239 Cal.App.2d 487, 48 Cal.Rptr. 765

Opinion Judge: [10] Devine

Party Name: Trejo v. Maciel

Attorney: [7] Morgan, Beauzay & Holmes and Robert Morgan for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel, John W. Appel, Popelka, Graham, Hanifin, Van Loucks & Allard and Robert J. Popelka for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday January 20, 1966

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

239 Cal.App.2d 487, 22157, Trejo v. Maciel

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 208 Cal. 200, L. A. 9763, Ryan v. Farrell
California - 14 Cal.2d 360, 17094, Westberg v. Willde
California - 16 Cal.2d 238, 17477, Robinson v. George
California - 23 Cal.2d 600, 18702, Loper v. Morrison
California - 59 Cal.2d 668, 27158, Meyer v. Blackman

See all quotations