Capital University Law Review

from May 2002
Last Number: June 2020

Capital University
ISSN 0198-9693


Cantidad de documentos en esta fuente: 489

March 01, 2016

  • The Gulf Coast Pipeline: A Stealthy Step Toward the Completion of the Keystone XL Pipeline Project

    • June 01, 2016

  • In Memory of Professor Michael Distelhorst: Legal Education

  • Persuading with Precedent: Understanding and Improving Analogies in Legal Argument

  • Scholar or Practitioner? Rethinking Qualifications for Entry-Level Tenure-Track Professors at Fourth-Tier Law Schools

  • Smarter Law Learning: Using Cognitive Science to Maximize Law Learning

  • The Course Source: The Casebook Evolved

  • Process Over Product: A Pedagogical Focus on Email as a Means of Refining Legal Analysis

    • December 01, 2016

  • Foreword to the Sullivan Lecture Essay: Is Privacy on Life Support?

  • After Snowden: Regulating Technology-Aided Surveillance in the Digital Age

  • The Fallacy of Liberal Discovery: Litigating Employment Discrimination Cases in the E-Discovery Age

  • Section 831(b) Captive Insurance Companies: Why Policymakers have it all Wrong

  • The Wrong Decision at the Right Time: How Aereo and its Aftermath Exposed the Need for Change in the Copyright Act

  • Metadata in Digital Photography: The Need for Protection and Production of this Silent Witness

  • Curfew must not Ring Tonight: Judicial Confusion and Misperception of Juvenile Curfew Laws

    • January 01, 2017

  • Crossing Two Color Lines: Interracial Marriage and Residential Segregation in Chicago

  • Intimate Integration: Lessons from the LGBT Civil Rights Movement

  • Interracial Marriage Litigation Foreshadows what the Obergefell Court Chose to Address

  • Reflections on the Persistence of Racial Segregation in Housing

  • The Myth of the Absent Sovereign

  • Misreading the Past: The Faulty Historical Basis Behind the Supreme Court's Decision in District of Columbia v. Heller

  • The Mascot Manifesto: Challenging the Constitutionality of Section 2(A) of The Lanham Act in a Heightened Era of Political Correctness

    • March 01, 2017

  • Straight out of Compton: Developmental Equality and a Critique of the Compton School Litigation

  • How 'Reasonable Efforts' Leads to Emotional and Legal Permanence

  • Flipped Out, Plugged In, and Wired Up: Fostering Success for Students with ADHD in the New Digital Law School

  • The Elective Share has no Friends: Creditors Trump Spouse in the Battle Over the Revocable Trust

    • June 01, 2017

  • The Social Security Disability Appeals Backlog Crisis and the Necessity of Radical Reform

  • Teaching Pierson v. Post

  • Bridging the Reading Gap in the Law School Classroom

  • The Roles of Sonia Sotomayor in Criminal Justice Cases

  • An Unqualified Right to Self-Defense: Alienage Restrictions and the Second Amendment

  • Wiping the Slate Clean: A Proposal to Expand Ohio's Expungement Statutes to Promote Effective Offender Reintegration

  • Flores v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services: Clearing the Way to Admission for Temporary Protected Status Beneficiaries

    • December 01, 2017

  • Scrutinizing Sex Under Natural law: Unitive Sex, Self-Gratifying Sex, and Concepts of Harm

  • Applying the Absolute Privilege to Defamation, Afforded in Judicial Proceedings, to Arbitration: A Logical Next Step for Ohio

  • The Umbilical Cord that Binds: Cross-Cultural Examination of the Politics of Achieving Effective Permanency and Adoption Policies in the United States and Brazil

  • Union Communications Privilege: Is it Time for Ohio to Protect Union Representative-Member Communications

  • Consumer Protections Down the Drain: Stopping the leaks in Ohio Law and the PUCO's Jurisdiction Concerning Submetering Companies

  • Equality is not Enough: The Importance of the Due Process Clause in Redefining Consent to a Sexual Encounter

  • Harmful Algal Blooms: Ohio Senate Bill 1 and the Challenge of Agricultural Regulation

    • January 01, 2018

  • Viewpoint Endorsement Equals Viewpoint Neutrality? The Circular Logic of Government Speech Doctrine

  • The Totalitarian Ideological Origins of Hate Speech Regulation

  • Silence is Golden: Olympic Property Protection in the Age of Social Media

  • Reopening the Courtroom Doors: A Proposal for an FCC Prohibition of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

    • March 01, 2018

  • One Not Like the Other: An Examination of the Use of the Affirmative Action Analogy in Reasonable Accommodation Cases Under The Americans with Disabilities Act

  • My Grandmother was Mrs. Palsgraf: Ways to Rethink Legal Education to Help Students Become Lawyers, Rather than just Thinking Like Them

  • Chesapeake Exploration, LLC v. Buell: A Flawed Decision

  • Is Discrimination just Another Tort?: A Discussion of Ohio's Attempt to Tortify Employment Discrimination

    • June 01, 2018

  • Wilson v. Lynch: Medical marijuana and the Second Amendment Coming to a Circuit Near You

  • Sullivan Lecture 2016 Engel: Divisiveness or Coercion?A response to Professor Marshall

  • A Public Concern: The Effect of Ohio's Confidential Law Enforcement Investigatory Exception on Public-Records Requests of Police Body Camera Footage