Capital University Law Review

from May 2002
Last Number: June 2020

Capital University
ISSN 0198-9693


Cantidad de documentos en esta fuente: 489

June 01, 2018

  • Flickering Lights on a Hill: The Decline in the Importance of the Right of Religious Conscience and its Implications

  • How Zivotofsky II and the Conservative Divide over the Foreign Affairs Power could Impact the Trump Administration

  • The Constitutionality of School Prayer: Or why Engel v. Vitale may have had it Right all Along

    • December 01, 2018

  • A Single Spark can Start a Prairie Fire: Implications of the 2015 Amendments to IEEE-SA's Patent Policy

  • Here Come Many More Mail-Order Brides: Why IMBRA Fails Women Escaping the Russian Federation

  • Legislating Against Hate: Why Ohio's Hate Crime Statute, and the Sentencing Enhancements that Support it, Cannot Remedy Institutional Problems and Continued Bigotry

  • The Pervasion of Cell Phones and the Fourth Amendment: A Right to Privacy in Locational Data

  • The Americans with Disabilities Act: Legal and Practical Applications in Child Protection Proceedings

    • June 01, 2019

  • Presidential Residual Power in Foreign Affairs

  • Public Universities and the First Amendment: Controversial Speakers, Protests, and Free Speech Policies

  • Incitement in the Era of Trump and Charlottesville

  • A Child is a Child, Except Under Ohio Law: A Discretionary Review of Mandatory Bindovers

    • December 01, 2019

  • The Possible Lingering Effects of Mini-DOMAs

  • Ohio's 2004 Super-DOMA: Popular Constitutionalism and Normalization in the Marriage. Equality Debate

  • Nix the 'Fix': An Analysis on Ohio's Criminal Sentencing Law and its Effect on Prison Population

  • Falling Short: How the International Olympic Committee's Transgender Regulations Falls Short of its Intended Purpose of Promoting Fairness in Sport and Competition

  • Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking as a Viable End-of-Life Option in Ohio

    • March 01, 2019

  • The Case for a Health Care Benefit Corporation

  • Cultivating Grit in Law Students: Grit, Deliberate Practice, and the First-Year Law School Curriculum

  • The Lawyer as Superhero: How Marvel Comics' Daredevil Depicts the American Court System and Legal Practice

  • Transfer Pricing Through §482-Looking Beyond Amazon v. Commissioner and other MNEs when Transferring Preexisting Intangibles under the Pre-2009 CSA Regulations

    • January 01, 2019

  • Transitioning Online

  • Revisiting the Right to a Speedy Trial: Reconciling the Sixth Amendment with The Speedy Trial Act

  • Do I Have to be Reasonable?: The Right to Arbitrarily Restrict Transfer of Occupancy and Mineral Leases

  • Til (Defaulted) Debt do us Part: The Need for Regulation of Debt Buyers Collecting on Delinquent Debt in the Aftermath of Henson v. Santander

  • More Isn't Better: Overtraining as a Cause of Action for Coach Negligence

  • The Secure Scheduling Movement: Why Every State Should Consider Enacting Secure Scheduling Legislation

    • June 01, 2020

  • Judicial Selection: Diversity, Discretion, Inclusion, and 'The Idea of Justice'

  • Non-Cooperative Compliance in the Corporate Tax Audit

  • Tax Treaty Overrides and Friendliness Towards International Law: A Comparative Approach to Put the Later-in-Time Rule to the Test

  • Qualified Opportunity Zones - How Active Participation and Complementary Legislation Can Help States Develop Their Distressed Communities

    • March 01, 2020

  • Gender-Silent Legislative Drafting in a Non-Binary World

  • Informants v. Innocents: Informant Testimony and its Contribution to Wrongful Convictions

  • A United Nations Convention on Cybercrime

  • Pharmacist Refusals in Ohio: A Compromise

    • January 01, 2020

  • Using Policy to Resolve the Circuit Split Over the Crime-Fraud Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege

  • Looking for Work in All the Wrong Places: An Argument for the Adoption of a Job-Seeker Visa in the United States

  • A Shadow of Ohio's Racist Past? Or a Lingering, Tangible Impact? An Examination of Unenforceable Restrictive Covenants

  • Now You See Me: An Examination of the Legality of Police Use of Utility Pole Surveillance Cameras