Argumentation and Advocacy

COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.
COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

from June 1992
Last Number: June 2019

Taylor & Francis Ltd.
ISSN 1051-1431


Cantidad de documentos en esta fuente: 650

June 22, 1997

  • Argument within a scientific debate: the case of the DRD2 A1 allele as a gene for alcoholism.

  • "A stranger to its laws": freedom, civil rights, and the legal ambiguity of Romer v. Evans (1996).

  • The 1997 Alta conference: Twenty years in the making.

  • The Alta conference: negotiating the disciplinary and cross-disciplinary study of argumentation.

    • September 22, 1997

  • Argument and multiple identities: contemporary European nationalism and environmentalism.

  • Argumentation and self: the enactment of identity in 'Dances with Wolves.'(Special Issue: Argument & Identity)

  • Russian electoral politics and the search for national identity.

    • March 22, 1997

  • Perceptions of rebuttal analogy: politeness and implications for persuasion.

  • Persuasive effects of story and statistical evidence.

  • Can we make intercollegiate debate more diverse?

  • A response to "Can we make intercollegiate debate more diverse?" (response to Pamela Stepp in this issue, p. 176)

  • Diversity in the public space: a response to Stepp.

  • A response to Frank and Fugate.

  • Catching a wave in the Internet surf: electronic extemporaneous speaking.

  • You Won't Believe this but...Responding to Student Complaints and Excuses.

    • January 01, 1998

  • Dialectical rapprochement in the new rhetoric.

  • A case study in metaphor as argument: a longitudinal analysis of the wall separating Church and State.

  • Encountering visions of Aztlan: arguments for ethnic pride, community activism and cultural revitalization in Chicano murals.

  • Public argument, civil society and what talk radio teaches about rhetoric.

    • March 22, 1998

  • Effects of presidential debate watching and ideology on attitudes and knowledge.

  • Rehabilitating emotion: the troublesome case of the Ku Klux Klan.

  • Audience recall of issues and image in Congressional debates.

    • June 22, 1998

  • Knowledge and performance in argument: disciplinary and proto-theory.

  • Terrible beauty and mundane detail: aesthetic knowledge in the practice of everyday life.

  • The aesthetic turn and the rhetorical perspective on argumentation.

  • Response to Lyne, Hariman, and Greene.

  • A Peculiar Humanism: The Judicial Advocacy of Slavery in High Courts of the Old South, 1820-1850.

  • Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-Cultural Introduction.

  • The Prophetic Tradition and Radical Rhetoric in America.

  • The Fragile Community: Living Together with AIDS.

    • December 22, 1999

  • "A plain public road": evaluating arguments for democracy in a post-metaphysical world.

    • January 01, 1999

  • Toward a normative conception of difference in public deliberation.

  • Naive theories of argument: avoiding interpersonal arguments or cutting them short.

    • March 22, 1999

  • The argument from definition revisited: race and definition in the Progressive era.

  • Finding protection in definitions: the quest for environmental security.

  • An ideological basis for definition in public argument: a case study of the individuals with Disabilities in Education Act.

  • Argumentation and debate textbooks: an overview of content and focus.

  • Argument Revisited; Argument Redefined: Negotiating Meaning in the Composition Classroom.

    • January 01, 2000

  • REVISIONING ARGUMENTATION EDUCATION FOR THE NEW CENTURY: MILLENNIAL CHALLENGES.

  • NEGOTIATING A CHANGE IN THE ARGUMENTATION COURSE: TEACHING COOPERATIVE ARGUMENT.

  • INVITING CONSTRUCTIVE ARGUMENT.

  • SIMULATED PUBLIC ARGUMENT AS A PEDAGOGICAL PLAY ON WORLDS.

  • TEACHING ADVANCED SEMINARS IN LEGAL AND BUSINESS ARGUMENT: SHARPENING TILE CRITICAL EDGE.

  • A RESEARCH-BASED JUSTIFICATION FOR DEBATE ACROSS THE CURRICULUM.

    • March 22, 2000

  • INTRODUCTION.

  • USE OF AD HOMINEM ARGUMENT IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE: THE BATTALINO CASE FROM THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL OF PRESIDENT CLINTON.

  • LIARS AND GHOSTS IN THE HOUSE OF CONGRESS: FRANK'S AD HOMINEM ARGUMENTS IN THE CASE AGAINST DOMA.

  • JOHN RANDOLPH OF ROANOKE AND THE ARGUMENTUM AD HOMINEM.

  • "13 ANGRY MEN": DALE BUMPER'S AD HOMINEM IMPEACHMENT TRIAL OF PRESIDENT CLINTON.

    • January 01, 2001

  • PERSUASIVE DEFINITIONS AND PUBLIC POLICY ARGUMENTS.