Zim Properties Ltd v Proctor

Afetações

CONSIDERS

• Davenport v Chilver

APLICA

• O'Brien v Benson's Hosiery (Holdings) Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF by

• [1985] BTC 42
• 58 TC 371

CITED NEUTRAL by

• Namol Pty Ltd v A W Baulderstone Pty Ltd (No 2)
• Kirby v Thorn E.M.I. Plc

APPLIED by

• Pennine Raceway Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (No. 2)

REFERRED by

• Gwinnutt v George and another
• Inland Revenue Commissioners v John Lewis Properties Plc

CONSIDERED by

• Pennine Raceway Ltd (Appellant v Kirklees Metropolitan Council (Respondent(compensating Authority)
• Stewart v Scottish Widows & Life Assurance Society Plc

Documentos citados

• Stoke-on-Trent City Council v Wood Mitchell & Company Ltd
• Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse
• Forster v Outred & Company
• Nokes v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries
• Aberdeen Construction Group Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue



Ver todas as citas

• O'Brien v Benson's Hosiery (Holdings) Ltd
• Marren v Ingles
• Drummond v Austin Brown
• O'Brien v Benson's Hosiery (Holdings) Ltd
• Marren v Ingles
• Hallamshire Industrial Finance Trust Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Montgomery
• O'Brien v Benson's Hosiery (Holdings) Ltd
• Midland Bank Trust Company Ltd v Hett, Stubbs & Kemp
• Davenport v Chilver
• Davis v Powell
• Dove v Banhams Patent Locks Ltd
• Glegg v Bromley
• Finance Act 1981
• Finance Act 1965
• Finance Act 1969
• Finance Act 1971
• Capital Gains Tax Act 1979