Yuri Mendes v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 - Articles : S-82
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Immigration Act 1971

[See more]

• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : S-5
• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : SCH-3
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 - Articles : S-120
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 - Articles : S-96
• Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 - Articles : S-55
• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : S-3
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
• Immigration Act 1971
• The Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016
• Covid-19 Credit Guarantee Scheme 2020
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-31

CONSIDERS

REFERS TO

• Booth v Parole Board
• Dover District Council v CPRE Kent
• (1) Paul Nixon v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• R (Fayad) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Kiarie v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R QR (Pakistan) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Hersi Guled v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ashish Balajigari v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Mrs Shirley Archer v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
• R (TN (Afghanistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department MA (Afghanistan) v Same
• ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Yuri Mendes v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Ali Hafeez) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Re M (A Child)
• R Yuri Mendes v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of FB (Afghanistan) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)
• R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No 2)
• R (Myckoo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of YZ (China)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Films Rover International Ltd v Cannon Film Sales Ltd

APPLIES

• American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd

APPLIED in

• Selevicius v SSHD

CONSIDERED in

• The Queen (on the application of Marius-Costel Costea) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Booth v Parole Board
• Kiarie v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd
• The Queen (on the application of YZ (China)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department



See all quotations

• Dover District Council v CPRE Kent
• R (Myckoo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No 2)
• Films Rover International Ltd v Cannon Film Sales Ltd
• R Mrs Shirley Archer v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
• Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
• Immigration Act 1971
• The Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016
• R (on the application of SG and Others (previously JS and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Yuri Mendes v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (TN (Afghanistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department MA (Afghanistan) v Same
• European Parliament v Council of the European Union.
• Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA.
• Ashish Balajigari v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• (1) Paul Nixon v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Fayad) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R QR (Pakistan) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Hersi Guled v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Ali Hafeez) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)
• R Yuri Mendes v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Re M (A Child)
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Courts Act, 1981
• Convention on the Rights of the Child
• R (on the application of FB (Afghanistan) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)