X.C. v R.T. (Succession: Proper provision)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• McD (P) v MN (Succession: Proper provision)

CONSIDERS

• Succession Act, 1965

REFERS TO

• Allhusem v Whittell
• Spencer v Kinsella

CITES

• B (E) v S (S) & McC (G)
• C.C. v W.C.
• D. v D

[See more]

• J. De B. v H.E. De B
• Mfh v Wbh
• L v L
• Re GM (Deceased); Re M; M v M
• McD (P) v MN (Succession: Proper provision)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2003] 2 ILRM 340
• [2003] 4 JIC 0203
• [2003] 2 IR 250

CONSIDERED in

• D.C. v D.R
• G. S. v M. B
• Re Estate of H.P. Deceased

[See more]

• K (M)(A Ward of Court) and Others v D (F) and Others

CITED in

• The estate of J.L.W.(Deceased) and s. 117 of the Succession Act 1965. C.W v L.W
• Butler v Butler and Others
• J.F. v S.G.

APPLIED in

• W. B v J. B
• C (A) v F (J)
• A. v T.D.

[See more]

• H v H

REFERRED in

• K v K

COMMENTED in

• Q v Minister for Health & Children
• E.H. v E.P.O'C. and Others

This document cites

---

• B (E) v S (S) & McC (G)
• D. v D
• Spencer v Kinsella
• L v L
• Allhusem v Whittell



See all quotations

• McD (P) v MN (Succession: Proper provision)
• Re GM (Deceased); Re M; M v M
• J. De B. v H.E. De B
• C.C. v W.C.
• McD (P) v MN (Succession: Proper provision)
• Mfh v Wbh
• Succession Act, 1965