Wood v Luscombe

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• LAW REFORM (MARRIED WOMEN AND TORTFEASORS) ACT, 1935, DATE OF COMMENCEMENT ORDER, 1935. Dated October 16, 1935.

DISTINGUISHES

• Randolph v Tuck

REFERS TO

• Randolph v Tuck
• Clyne v Yardley
• Ord v Ord

[See more]

• Marginson v Blackburn Borough Council
• Bourhill v Young
• Hunter v Stewart

FOLLOWS

• Bell v Holmes

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1965] 3 WLR 996
• [1964] 3 All ER 972
• [1966] 1 QB 169

REFERRED in

• Sellen v Bailey
• Jaidin bin Jaiman v Loganathan a/l Karpaya
• Nolan v Listowel U.D.C.

CONSIDERED in

• Mark Ralph Davies v John A. Bates (Contractors) Ltd
• Sellen v Bailey
• Edwards v Arscott et Al

FOLLOWED in

• Wall v Radford

This document cites

• Bourhill v Young
• Bell v Holmes
• Marginson v Blackburn Borough Council
• Ord v Ord
• Hunter v Stewart



See all quotations

• Randolph v Tuck