Wolverhampton City Council and Others v London Gypsies and Travellers and Others

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Articles : S-187B
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873

[See more]

• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-18
• Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-222
• Police and Justice Act 2006 - Articles : S-27
• Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 - Articles : S-1
• Highways Act 1980 - Articles : S-130
• Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
• Equality Act 2010
• Road Traffic Act 1988 - Articles : S-151
• Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960 - Articles : S-23
• Caravan Sites Act 1968 - Articles : S-6
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-8
• Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Articles : S-124
• Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
• Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-235
• Open Spaces Act 1906 - Articles : S-15
• Public Health Act 1875 - Articles : S-164
• Commons Act 1899
• National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949
• Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006
• Countryside Act 1968 - Articles : S-41
• Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 - Articles : S-17
• Equality Act 2010
• Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-37
• Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990
• National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Commons Act 1899
• Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873
• Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006

CONSIDERS

• James Longley & Company Ltd South West Thames Regional Health Authority
• Birmingham City Council v Afsar and Others

REFERS TO

• Re M and N (Wards) (Publication of Information)
• Broadmoor Special Hospital Authority and Another v Robinson
• Burris v Azadani

[See more]

• Hubbard v Pitt
• Murphy v Murphy
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• Attorney General v Newspaper Publishing Plc
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Persons Unknown
• News Group Newspapers Ltd v Society of Graphical and Allied Trades 1982 (No. 2)
• Channel Tunnel Group Ltd and Another v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd and Others
• Dresser UK Ltd v Falcongate Freight Management Ltd (Sub nom Duke of Yare)
• T.S.B. Private Bank International S.A. v Chabra
• Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Castanho v Brown & Root (U.K.) Ltd
• Bankers Trust Company v Shapira
• Attorney General v Leveller Magazine Ltd
• Siskina (Owners of cargo lately laden on board) v Distos Compania Naviera S.A.
• South Carolina Insurance Company v Assurantie Maatschappij ‘De Zeven Provincien’South Carolina Insurance Company v Assurantie Maatschappij N.v
• Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd
• British Airways Board v Laker Airways Ltd
• Stoke-on-Trent City Council v B & Q (Retail) Ltd
• Re X (A Minor) (Wardship: Injunction)
• Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• Z Ltd v A-Z and AA-LL
• Re F. (orse. A.) (A Minor) (Publication of Information)
• McPhail v Persons, Names Unknown; Bristol Corporation v Ross
• Re Wykeham Terrace, Brighton, Sussex, ex parte Territorial Auxiliary and Volunteer Reserve Association for the South East
• Attorney General v Chaudry
• Manchester Corpn; v Connolly
• McPhail v Doulton, sub nom Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 1)
• Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Guaranty Trust Company of New York v Hannay & Company
• Attorney General v Harris
• Mareva Compania Naviera S.A. v International Bulkcarriers S.A.
• Fourie v Le Roux and Others
• Carr v News Group Newspapers Ltd and Others
• EMI Records Ltd v Kudhail
• Marengo v Daily Sketch and Sunday Graphic Ltd
• Friern Barnet Urban District Council v Adams
• Heathrow Airport Ltd and Others v Garman and Others
• HM Revenue and Customs v Egleton
• 1RWE Npower Plc 2 John Patrick Rainford v 1 Rev. Malcolm Carrol 2 David Howarth 3 Mike Powell 4 Christopher Ward 5 Anthony Bailey 6 Dr.Peter Harbour
• X (A Woman Formerly Known as Mary Bell) and Another v O'brien and Others
• Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Intending Trespassers upon Chineham Incinerator Site
• Cardile v Led Builders Pty Ltd
• Opq v Bjm
• A-G v Punch Ltd and Another
• Ashworth Hospital Authority v MGN Ltd
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Persons unknown
• Re R (Wardship: Restrictions on Publication)
• Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd
• Harlow District Council and Another v Stokes and Others
• Mercedes-Benz AG v Leiduck
• Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting
• Brett Wilson Llp v Person(s) Unknown, Responsible for the Operation and Publication of the Website www.solicitorsfromhelluk.com (Defendant(s)
• Cartier International AG and Others (Claimants/Respondents (HC14 C01382) Cartier International AG (Claimant/ Respondent (HC14 C001056) v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others (Defendants/Appellants (HC14 C01382 & HC14 C001056) The Open Rights Group (Intervener)
• A (A protected party by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and Another v Persons Unknown
• Barton v Wright Hassall LLP
• Cartier International AG and Others v British Telecommunications Plc and another
• UK Oil & Gas Investments Plc (2) Kimmeridge Oil & Gas Ltd (3) Magellan Petroleum (UK) Ltd (4) Horse Hill Developments Ltd (5) UKOG (GB) Ltd v Persons unknown Who are Protestors against the Exploration and/or Extraction of Mineral Oil or Relative Hydrocarbon or Natural Gas by the Claimant(s) and Who are Involved in the Following Acts or any of them:
• CMOC Sales & Marketing Ltd v Person Unknown and 30 others
• Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
• Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others
• RXG v Ministry of Justice
• 1) Albert John Martin Abela and Others (Respondents/Claimants) v Ahmad Baadarani
• South Buckinghamshire DC v Porter (No 1)
• Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v Meier and Others
• R (L) v Westminster City Council (MIND and another intervening)
• The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown
• Cuadrilla Bowland Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land at Little Plumpton as More Particularly Described in the Claim form and Shown Edged Red on the Plan Annexed to the Claim Form
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• ‘D’ v Persons Unknown
• HM Attorney General v Crosland
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
• Craig Winch
• Craig Winch v and an application for a contra mundum injunction
• HM Attorney General v Crosland (No. 2)
• Broad Idea International Ltd v Convoy Collateral Ltd (British Virgin Islands); Convoy Collateral Ltd v Cho Kwai Chee (also known as Cho Kwai Chee Roy) (British Virgin Islands)
• Lisa Smith v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities
• M Michaels (Furriers) Ltd v Askew
• UK Nirex Ltd v Barton (1986)
• Meux v Maltby
• Ernst & Young Ltd and Others v Department of Immigration
• Tony Blain Pty Ltd v Splain
• Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia

AFFIRMS

• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown

CONSIDERED in

• St Albans City and District Council v Mr Anthony Hugh Taylerson
• Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council v Shane Heron and Others
• Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Craig Steven Wright

[See more]

• The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield v Charles Snell
• Loudmila Bourlakova v Oleg Bourlakov
• Tendring District Council v Persons Unknown
• Drax Power Ltd v Persons Unknown
• Motorola Mobility LLC v Ericsson Ltd
• London City Airport Ltd v Persons unknown Who, in Connection with the Just Stop Oil or Other Environmental Campaign, Enter Occupy or Remain (Without the Claimants' Consent) Upon that Area of Land known as London City Airport (as Shown for Identification Edged Red on Plan 1) but Excluding those Areas of Land as Further Defined in the Claim Form
• Buckinghamshire Council v Jimmy Barrett
• Wolverhampton City Council and Others v Persons Unknown and Others
• Jockey Club v Persons unknown
• Exolum Pipeline System Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown
• London Borough of Havering v William Stokes
• Joseph Donovan v Prescott Place Freeholder Ltd & Others
• Leeds Bradford Airport Ltd and Others v Persons Uknown
• HWL Ebsworth Lawyers v Persons Unknown
• Mex Group Worldwide Ltd v Stewart Owen Ford
• Basildon Borough Council v Eliza Saunders
• PMC (a child by his mother and litigation friend FLR) v A Local Health Board
• The University of London v Abel Harvie-Clark
• LB Enfield v Persons Unknown
• Shell v PUs & Ireland & Laurie
• The Kingdom of Spain v The London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Insurance Association Ltd
• Valero Energy Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown and Others
• High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd v Not Used
• Transport for London v Persons Unknown
• Heathrow Airport Ltd v Persons Unknown Who (in Connection with Just Stop Oil or other Environmental Campaign) Enter, Occupy or Remain (Without the Claimant's Consent) Upon ‘London Heathrow Airport’ as is Shown Edged Purple on the Attached Plan a to the Particulars of Claim

REFERRED in

• St Albans City and District Council v Mr Anthony Hugh Taylerson
• Loudmila Bourlakova v Oleg Bourlakov
• Buckinghamshire Council v Jimmy Barrett

[See more]

• Wolverhampton City Council and Others v Persons Unknown and Others
• Jockey Club v Persons unknown
• Joseph Donovan v Prescott Place Freeholder Ltd & Others
• Mooij v Persons Unknown and Others
• Queen Mary University of London v LSY
• Thurrock Council v Madeleine Adams
• Mex Group Worldwide Ltd v Stewart Owen Ford
• Buckinghamshire Council v Jimmy Barrett
• Arla Foods Ltd v Persons Unknown Who are, without the Consent of the Claimants, Entering or Remaining on Land and in Buildings on Any of the Sites Listed in Schedule 2 of the Claim Form (“The Sites”), Those Being:

CITED in

• Tippawan Boonyaem v Pesons Unknown Category (A)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2024] 2 WLR 45
• [05/02/2024] TLR 1

This document cites

• MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Greenpeace Canada et al., (1996) 199 N.R. 279 (SCC)
• Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
• Cartier International AG and Others v British Telecommunications Plc and another
• Barton v Wright Hassall LLP
• Broadmoor Special Hospital Authority and Another v Robinson



See all quotations

• Re M and N (Wards) (Publication of Information)
• Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting
• Cartier International AG and Others (Claimants/Respondents (HC14 C01382) Cartier International AG (Claimant/ Respondent (HC14 C001056) v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others (Defendants/Appellants (HC14 C01382 & HC14 C001056) The Open Rights Group (Intervener)
• Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd
• Ashworth Hospital Authority v MGN Ltd
• Burris v Azadani
• Stoke-on-Trent City Council v B & Q (Retail) Ltd
• Harlow District Council and Another v Stokes and Others
• McPhail v Doulton, sub nom Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 1)
• McPhail v Persons, Names Unknown; Bristol Corporation v Ross
• Z Ltd v A-Z and AA-LL
• Siskina (Owners of cargo lately laden on board) v Distos Compania Naviera S.A.
• Mareva Compania Naviera S.A. v International Bulkcarriers S.A.
• Dresser UK Ltd v Falcongate Freight Management Ltd (Sub nom Duke of Yare)
• Re F. (orse. A.) (A Minor) (Publication of Information)
• A (A protected party by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and Another v Persons Unknown
• Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd
• Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Intending Trespassers upon Chineham Incinerator Site
• A-G v Punch Ltd and Another
• Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Fourie v Le Roux and Others
• Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• Hubbard v Pitt
• South Carolina Insurance Company v Assurantie Maatschappij ‘De Zeven Provincien’South Carolina Insurance Company v Assurantie Maatschappij N.v
• X (A Woman Formerly Known as Mary Bell) and Another v O'brien and Others
• Channel Tunnel Group Ltd and Another v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd and Others
• Manchester Corpn; v Connolly
• British Airways Board v Laker Airways Ltd
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• 1RWE Npower Plc 2 John Patrick Rainford v 1 Rev. Malcolm Carrol 2 David Howarth 3 Mike Powell 4 Christopher Ward 5 Anthony Bailey 6 Dr.Peter Harbour