Wolstanton Ltd and Attorney General of Duchy of Lancaster v Newcastle-under-Lyme Corporation

Core Citations

CITES

• Dalton v Henry Angus & Co; Commissioners of HM Works and Public Buildings v Henry Angus & Co; sub nom Angus & Company v Dalton
• William Hilton against The Right Honourable Granville, Earl Granville

CONSIDERS

• The Duke of Buccleuch v Wakefield
• Rowbotham v Wilson
• Wilkes v Broadbent

[See more]

• Gill v Dickinson
• Butterknowle Colliery Company v Bishop Auckland Industrial Co-operative Company
• Lockwood v Wood

CONSIDERS

• Law of Property Act 1922

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Wolstanton Ltd and Attorney General of Duchy of Lancaster v Newcastle-under-Lyme Corporation

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1940] UKHL J0530-4
• [1940] 3 All ER 101
• 55 TLR 965

[See more]

• [1940] AC 860

CITED in

• Takamore v Clarke COA CA

This document cites

• Butterley Company, Ltd v New Hucknall Colliery Company, Ltd
• Wilkes v Broadbent
• Tyson against Smith
• Lockwood v Wood
• William Hilton against The Right Honourable Granville, Earl Granville



See all quotations

• The Duke of Buccleuch v Wakefield
• Rowbotham v Wilson
• Butterknowle Colliery Company v Bishop Auckland Industrial Co-operative Company
• Dalton v Henry Angus & Co; Commissioners of HM Works and Public Buildings v Henry Angus & Co; sub nom Angus & Company v Dalton
• Butterknowle Colliery Company v Bishop Auckland Industrial Co-operative Company
• Gill v Dickinson
• Law of Property Act 1922