Wicks v State Rail Authority of New South Wales Sheehan v State Rail Authority of New South Wales

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Cole v South Tweed Heads Rugby League Football Club Ltd
• Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak
• Vairy v Wyong Shire Council

[See more]

• Amaca Pty Ltd v New South Wales
• [Court of Session—Second Division.]
• Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak (Matter No S191/2009)

DISTINGUISHES

• Hambrook v Stokes Brothers
• Chester v Waverley Corporation

REFERS TO

• Tame v New South Wales

CITED in

• Altaranesi v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW
• AMP Capital Property Nominees Ltd v Westfield Management Ltd
• Naw Eh Soe v Alberto Carapella

CONSIDERED in

• Edward Robert Jausnik(Plaintiff) v The Nominal Defendant
• Optus Administration Pty Ltd(Appellant) v Glenn Wright by his tutor James Stuart Wright (First Respondent)
• Capar v SPG Investments Pty Ltd t/a Lidcombe Power Centre and Others (No 5)

[See more]

• Sdrolias v Power Distribution Services Pty Ltd
• Watson v State of NSW
• Merryn Elizabeth McKenna v Hunter & New England Local Health District
• Singh bhnf Ambu Kanwar v Lynch
• King v Philcox
• Khan v R
• State of New South Wales(Appellant) v Ryan Briggs
• The Owners – Strata Plan No 84674 v Pafburn Pty Ltd
• Median Nazar Ibrahimi(Plaintiff) v Commonwealth of Australia
• Walsh v State of New South Wales

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 267 ALR 23
• 241 CLR 60

This document cites

• Cole v South Tweed Heads Rugby League Football Club Ltd
• Tame v New South Wales
• Wicks v Railcorp; Sheehan v State Rail
• Amaca Pty Ltd v New South Wales
• Vairy v Wyong Shire Council



See all quotations

• Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak
• Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak (Matter No S191/2009)
• [Court of Session—Second Division.]
• Chester v Waverley Corporation
• Hambrook v Stokes Brothers