Whyte and MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Another

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Sabel BV v Puma AG (Case C-251/95)

CITES

• Okotoks Limted (Formerly Spicerhaart Ltd) and Another v Fine & Country Ltd and Others
• R (AH and Others (Sudan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening)
• Aveda Corporation v Dabur India Ltd

[See more]

• South Cone Inc. v Bessant and Others (t/a Reef)
• MA (Somalia) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CONSIDERS

• Trade Marks Act 1994

CONSIDERED in

• SoulCycle Inc. v Matalan Ltd
• Virgin Enterprises Ltd v Virginic LLC
• Nicoventures Holdings Ltd v The London Vape Company Ltd

[See more]

• Thatchers Cider Company Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd
• Natural Instinct Ltd v Natures Menu Ltd
• W3 Ltd v Easygroup Ltd
• Lifestyle Equities CV v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd
• Sazerac Brands, LLC v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd
• TVIS Ltd v Howserv Services Ltd
• TVIS Ltd v Howserv Services Ltd

CITED in

• The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks and Another v Intellectual Property Agency Ltd and Another
• Combe International LLC v Dr August Wolff GmbH & Company KG Arzneimittel
• Sky Plc v Skykick UK Ltd

REFERRED in

• Virgin Enterprises Ltd v Virginic LLC
• Thatchers Cider Company Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd
• Natural Instinct Ltd v Natures Menu Ltd

[See more]

• KBF Enterprises Ltd v Gladiator Nutrition 3.0 Ltd (now dissolved)
• Planetart LLC (incorporated under the laws of Delaware, USA) v Photobox Ltd
• Easygroup Ltd v Easylife Ltd (Formerly Easylife Group Ltd)
• Easygroup Ltd v Easyway SBH (a company incorporated under the laws of St Barthelemy)

RELIED UPON in

• Revive A Phone Ltd v WeFix

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2015] FSR 33
• [2015] ETMR 29

APPLIED in

• Easygroup Ltd v Easy Live (Services) Ltd

This document cites

• R (AH and Others (Sudan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening)
• South Cone Inc. v Bessant and Others (t/a Reef)
• Aveda Corporation v Dabur India Ltd
• Okotoks Limted (Formerly Spicerhaart Ltd) and Another v Fine & Country Ltd and Others
• Sabel BV v Puma AG (Case C-251/95)



See all quotations

• Trade Marks Act 1994
• MA (Somalia) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Medion AG v Thomson multimedia Sales Germany & Austria GmbH.
• Marca Mode CV contra Adidas AG y Adidas Benelux BV.
• Claude Ruiz-Picasso and Others v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation.
• T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA.
• Bimbo SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas.
• Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Orange A/S.
• BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Il Ponte Finanziaria SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH contra Klijsen Handel BV.
• Formula One Licensing BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Global Sports Media Ltd.
• Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• SABEL BV contra Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport.
• Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)