Why Justice Scalia should be a constitutional comparativist ... sometimes.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 56 F.3d 464 (2nd Cir. 1995), 1359, United States v. Then
• Federal Cases - 477 U.S. 399 (1986), 85-5542, Ford v. Wainwright
• Federal Cases - 492 U.S. 302 (1989), 87-6177, Penry v. Lynaugh
• Federal Cases - 492 U.S. 361 (1989), 87-5765, Stanford v. Kentucky
• Federal Cases - 509 U.S. 579 (1993), 92-102, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 521 U.S. 898 (1997), 95-1478, Printz v. United States
• Federal Cases - 528 U.S. 990 (1999), 99-5291, Knight v. Florida
• Federal Cases - 536 U.S. 304 (2002), 00-8452, Atkins v. Virginia
• Federal Cases - 539 U.S. 306 (2003), 02-241, Grutter v. Bollinger
• Federal Cases - 539 U.S. 558 (2003), 02-102, Lawrence v. Texas
• Federal Cases - 540 U.S. 644 (2004), 02-1348, Olympic Airways v. Husain
• Federal Cases - 541 U.S. 36 (2004), 02-9410, Crawford v. Washington
• Federal Cases - 543 U.S. 551 (2005), 03-633, Roper v. Simmons
• Federal Cases - 252 U.S. 416 (1920), 609, State of Missouri v. Holland
• Federal Cases - 272 U.S. 52 (1926), 2, Myers v. United States
• Federal Cases - 347 U.S. 483 (1954), 1, 2, 4, 10., Brown v. Board of Ed. of Topeka, Shawnee County, Kan.
• Federal Cases - 356 U.S. 86 (1958), 70, Trop v. Dulles