Why (and when) cities have a stake in enforcing the Constitution.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 896 F.2d 1046 (7th Cir. 1990), 89-1655, Alleghany Corp. v. Haase
• Federal Cases - 588 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir. 1979), 78-2505, Rogers v. Brockette
• Federal Cases - 274 F.3d 464 (7th Cir. 2001), 01-2084, Gernetzke v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1
• Federal Cases - 128 F.3d 289 (6th Cir. 1997), 94-3855, Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati
• Federal Cases - 886 F.2d 247 (9th Cir. 1989), 88-3563, Chaloux v. Killeen



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 699 F.2d 507 (10th Cir. 1983), 80-2178, City of Moore, Okl. v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Ry. Co.
• Federal Cases - 161 F.3d 619 (10th Cir. 1998), 97-1158, Branson School Dist. RE-82 v. Romer
• Federal Cases - 133 U.S. 529 (1890), Lincoln County v. Luning
• Federal Cases - 134 U.S. 1 (1890), Hans v. Louisiana
• Federal Cases - 457 U.S. 800 (1982), 80-945, Harlow v. Fitzgerald
• Federal Cases - 458 U.S. 457 (1982), 81-9, Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1
• Federal Cases - 458 U.S. 592 (1982), 80-1305, Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico ex rel. Barez
• Federal Cases - 488 U.S. 469 (1989), 87-998, City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.
• Federal Cases - 517 U.S. 620 (1996), 94-1039, Romer v. Evans
• Federal Cases - 518 U.S. 1001 (1996), 95-239, Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati
• Federal Cases - 525 U.S. 943 (1998), 97-1795, Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati v. Cincinnati
• Federal Cases - 539 U.S. 558 (2003), 02-102, Lawrence v. Texas
• Federal Cases - 191 U.S. 138 (1903), 81, Smith v. Indiana
• Federal Cases - 207 U.S. 161 (1907), 264, Hunter v. Pittsburgh
• Federal Cases - 262 U.S. 182 (1923), 430, Trenton v. New Jersey
• Federal Cases - 262 U.S. 447 (1923), 24, Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon
• Federal Cases - 272 U.S. 365 (1926), 31, Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
• Federal Cases - 285 U.S. 262 (1932), New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann
• Federal Cases - 118 U.S. 425 (1886), Norton v. Shelby County
• Federal Cases - 343 U.S. 579 (1952), Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
• Federal Cases - 383 U.S. 301 (1966), 22, South Carolina v. Katzenbach
• Federal Cases - 392 U.S. 236 (1968), 660, Board of Education v. Allen
• Federal Cases - 416 U.S. 232 (1974), 72-914, Scheuer v. Rhodes
• Federal Cases - 418 U.S. 166 (1974), 72-885, United States v. Richardson
• Federal Cases - 436 U.S. 658 (1978), 75-1914, Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York
• Federal Cases - 438 U.S. 478 (1978), 76-709, Butz v. Economou
• Federal Cases - 439 U.S. 60 (1978), 77-515, Holt Civic Club v. City of Tuscaloosa
• Federal Cases - 439 U.S. 1389 (1978), A-355, City of Boston v. Anderson
• California - 33 Cal.4th 1055, S122923, Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco
• Colorado - 973 P.2d 717 (Colo.App. 1998), 97CA1481, Schaefer v. City & County of Denver