Whitfield v. Roth

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Whitfield v. Roth

SUPERSEDES

• Whitfield v. Roth

SUPERSEDED BY STATUTE in

• Shively v. Bozanich

DISTINGUISHED in

• Keehn v. La Jolla Cosmetic Laser Clinic
• Keehn v. La Jolla Cosmetic Laser Clinic
• Roberti v. Control

This document cites

• California - Hirschman v. Saxon
• California - Stanford v. City of Ontario
• California - Hoffman v. Brandt
• California - Frampton v. Hartzell
• California - Wozniak v. Peninsula Hospital



See all quotations

• California - DeVault v. Logan
• California - Horn v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.
• California - Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority
• California - People v. Watson
• California - Lynch Meats of Oakland, Inc. v. City of Oakland
• California - Hom v. Chico Unified School Dist.
• California - Tammen v. San Diego County
• California - Kelley v. Bailey
• California - Springer v. Reimers
• US - Reference Stubs - Failure to present claim not bar or defense to maintaining suit
• US - Reference Stubs - Petition for relief from requirement to present claim
• US - Reference Stubs - Board
• US - Reference Stubs - Granting application for leave to present untimely claim
• US - Reference Stubs - Application for leave to present untimely filed claim
• US - Reference Stubs - Contents of claim presented
• US - Reference Stubs - Construction of part governed by definitions
• US - Reference Stubs - Action prohibited until claim presented and acted upon or rejected by board
• US - Reference Stubs - Date of accrual of cause of action
• US - Reference Stubs - Time for presenting claims; date claim presented
• US - Reference Stubs - Ca. Gov. Code § 915 Manner of Presenting Claim