White v Minnis and Another

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Thom's Exrx v Russel & Aitken
• Hunter v Dowling
• White v Minnis and Another

[See more]

• Clark v Watson

REFERS TO

• Shaw v Shaw
• Attorney General v Boden
• Pilling v Pilling

[See more]

• Wilson v Dunbar
• Coventry v Barclay
• Pettyt v Janeson
• Noble v Noble

RESUELVE RECURSO

• White v Minnis and Another

APPLIES

• Hunter v Dowling

DISTINGUISHES

• Cruickshank and Others v Sutherland and Others (ex parte as to Henry Charles Begg)

CONSIDERS

• Partnership Act 1890 - Articles : S-27
• Partnership Act 1890
• Partnership Act 1890 - Articles : S-33

[See more]

• Partnership Act 1890 - Articles : S-39
• Partnership Act 1890 - Articles : S-19

CITED in

• A City Council v DC and Others
• John Ronald Ham v Ronald William Ham & Lorna Jean Ham

CONSIDERED in

• Drake v Harvey and Others
• Abdul Rahman Hayel v Abdul Aziz Hayel (a protected party, by Tarek Hayel, his litigation friend)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2000] 3 All ER 618
• 10/05/2000 Daily Cases
• [2001] CH 393

[See more]

• [2000] 3 WLR 885

This document cites

• Cruickshank and Others v Sutherland and Others (ex parte as to Henry Charles Begg)
• Coventry v Barclay
• Hunter v Dowling
• Shaw v Shaw
• Wilson v Dunbar



See all quotations

• White v Minnis and Another
• Hunter v Dowling
• Pettyt v Janeson
• Noble v Noble
• Pilling v Pilling
• Thom's Exrx v Russel & Aitken
• Attorney General v Boden
• Clark v Watson
• Education Act 1996
• Partnership Act 1890