Whether The Special Master for Troubled Asset Relief Program Executive Compensation Is A Principal Officer Under The Appointments Clause, 110510 DOJ, 10-9

This document cites

• Federal Cases - Application of 28 U.S.C. § 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 95-29
• Federal Cases - Morrison v. Olson
• Federal Cases - The Constitutional Separation of Powers Between the President and Congress, 96-17
• Federal Cases - Auer v. Robbins
• Federal Cases - Buckley v. Valeo



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - United States v. Germaine
• Federal Cases - Bowles v. Seminole Rock Sand Co
• Federal Cases - Myers v. United States
• Federal Cases - Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council
• Federal Cases - Sealed Case, In re
• Federal Cases - Freytag v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
• Federal Cases - Secretary of Education Review of Administrative Law Judge Decisions
• Federal Cases - In re Motors Liquidation Co.
• Federal Cases - United States v. Nixon Nixon v. United States 8212 1766, 73 8212 1834
• Federal Cases - Darby v. Cisneros
• Federal Cases - Bowsher v. Synar United States Senate v. Synar Neill v. Synar 85 1379
• US - Reference Stubs - Q-17: How do the effective date provisions apply with respect to the requirements under section 111 of EESA?
• US - Reference Stubs - Q-16: What is the Office of the Special Master for TARP Executive Compensation, and what are its powers, duties and responsibilities?