Extract
Whether Members of the Sentencing Commission Who Were Appointed Prior to the Enactment of a Holdover Statute May Exercise Holdover Rights Pursuant to the Statute, 040594 DOJ, 94-7
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
-
Federal Cases - Mistretta v. United States United States v. Mistretta
-
Federal Cases - Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc
-
Federal Cases - Whether Members of the Sentencing Commission Who Were Appointed Prior to the Enactment of a Holdover Statute May Exercise Holdover Rights Pursuant to the Statute, 94-7
-
Federal Cases - Rust v. Sullivan New York v. Sullivan
-
Federal Cases - Immigration & Naturalization Serv. v. Cardoza-Fonseca
See all quotations
-
Federal Cases - Buckley v. Valeo
-
Federal Cases - Investment Bankers, Inc., In re
-
Federal Cases - Koerner, Matter of
-
Federal Cases - Staebler v. Carter
-
Federal Cases - United States Ex Pel Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware Hudson Company Same v. Erie Railroad Company Same v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey Same v. Delaware, Lackawanna Western Railroad Company Same v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company Same v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company United States v. Delaware Hudson Company Same v. Erie Railroad Company Same v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey Same v. Delaware, Lackawanna Western Railroad Company Same v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company Same v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company
-
Federal Cases - Shoemaker v. United States
-
Federal Cases - Federal Election Com'n v. NRA Political Victory Fund, 91-5360
-
Federal Cases - George Moore Ice Cream Co v. Rose
-
Federal Cases - United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc
-
Federal Cases - The Legal Significance of Presidential Signing Statements, 93-16
-
Federal Cases - Benny, In re
-
Federal Cases - Mackie v. Clinton, Civ. A. No. 93-0032-LFO.
-
Federal Cases - United States v. Jin Fuey Moy