When the facts and the law are against you, argue the genes? A pragmatic analysis of genotyping mitigation defenses for psychopathic defendants in death penalty cases.
›
Linked as:Extract
When the facts and the law are against you, argue the genes? A pragmatic analysis of genotyping mitigation defenses for psychopathic defendants in death penalty cases.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 293 F. 1013 (D.D.C. 1923), 3968, Frye v. United States
- Federal Cases - 455 U.S. 104 (1982), 80-5727, Eddings v. Oklahoma
- Federal Cases - 462 U.S. 862 (1983), 81-89, Zant v. Stephens
- Federal Cases - 466 U.S. 668 (1984), 82-1554, Strickland v. Washington
- Federal Cases - 509 U.S. 579 (1993), 92-102, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
