Wharton v. Worldwide Dedicated Services, No. 04C-02-035 WCC (Del. Super. 2/2/2007)

This document cites

• Delaware - Moore v. Sizemore
• Delaware - Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc., CROTHALL-AMERICA
• Federal Cases - Bickling v. Kent General Hosp., Inc., Civ. A. No. 93-334 MMS.
• Delaware - Ebersole v. Lowengrub
• Delaware - Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Rockford Enterprises, Inc., BROWNING-FERRI



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - Eastern Assoc. Coal v. United Mine Workers
• Delaware - Schueler v. Martin
• Delaware - Price v. Blood Bank of Delaware, Inc., 191,2001.
• US - Reference Stubs - How is the collection process completed?
• US - Reference Stubs - How does an employee request a test of a split specimen?
• US - Reference Stubs - On what basis does the MRO verify test results involving 6-acetylmorphine, codeine, and morphine?
• US - Reference Stubs - What are the MRO's responsibilities in the DOT drug testing program?
• US - Reference Stubs - How does the MRO obtain information for the verification decision?
• US - Reference Stubs - How does the MRO notify employees of their right to a test of the split specimen?
• US - Reference Stubs - May the MRO change a verified drug test result?
• US - Reference Stubs - What drugs do laboratories test for?
• US - Reference Stubs - Who does this regulation cover?
• US - Reference Stubs - Who is qualified to act as an MRO?
• US - Reference Stubs - Alcohol and controlled substances testing