Western Australia v Manado; Western Australia v Augustine; Commonwealth of Australia v Augustine; Commonwealth of Australia v Manado

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Mace v Philcox
• Gumana (on behalf of the Yarrwidi Gumatj and other groups) v Northern Territory of Australia (No NTD6035 of 2002)
• Minister for Resources v Dover Fisheries Pty Ltd

[See more]

• Lord Fitzhardinge v Purcell
• Mary Yarmirr v Northern Territory
• Amp Inc. v Utilux Pty. Ltd
• William Malcomson, - Appellant; John O'Dea and Others, - Respondents
• William Gann v The Free Fishers of Whitstable
• Kanak v Minister for Land and Water Conservation
• Llandudno Urban Council v Woods
• Commonwealth v Yarmirr
• Attorney General v Antrobus
• Brinckman v Matley
• Burton, Children, and Burton against Issitt
• [Court of Session—Second Division.]
• Williams-Ellis v Cobb
• Wheaton v Maple & Company

CONSIDERS

• Law of Property Act 1925

This document cites

• Amp Inc. v Utilux Pty. Ltd
• Quinn v Leathem
• Brinckman v Matley
• Blundell against Catterall
• William Gann v The Free Fishers of Whitstable



See all quotations

• [Court of Session—Second Division.]
• Mary Yarmirr v Northern Territory
• Llandudno Urban Council v Woods
• Minister for Resources v Dover Fisheries Pty Ltd
• Kanak v Minister for Land and Water Conservation
• Commonwealth v Yarmirr
• Attorney General v Antrobus
• Burton, Children, and Burton against Issitt
• Lord Fitzhardinge v Purcell
• William Malcomson, - Appellant; John O'Dea and Others, - Respondents
• Williams-Ellis v Cobb
• Wheaton v Maple & Company
• Atty.-Gen'l for Canada v Ritchie Contracting and Supply Company and Att'y.-Gen'l for British Columbia
• Gumana (on behalf of the Yarrwidi Gumatj and other groups) v Northern Territory of Australia (No NTD6035 of 2002)
• Mace v Philcox
• Law of Property Act 1925