West Midlands Joint Electricity Authority v Pitt ; Minister of Transport v Pitt

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation) Act 1919 - Articles : S-1
• Electricity (Supply) Act 1919 - Articles : S-22
• Electric Lighting Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

CITES

• Roderick v Aston Local Board
• Great Western Railway Company v Swindon and Cheltenham Extension Railway Company

[See more]

• Escott v Newport Corporation
• Guaranty Trust Company of New York v Hannay & Company
• Postmaster-General v Brooks
• Metropolitan Water Board v Berton
• The King against The Justices of Middlesex
• British Columbia Electric Railway Company v Stewart
• Re Corporation of Dudley
• London and North Western Railway Company v Evans
• Edinburgh Street Tramways Company v Torbain
• Shelfer and Another v City of London Electric Lighting Company
• Central Control Board (Liquor Traffic) v Cannon Brewery Company Ltd
• Blackpool Corporation v Starr Estate Company

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 48 TLR 180

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• West Midlands Joint Electricity Authority v Pitt ; Minister of Transport v Pitt

AFFIRMED in

• West Midlands Joint Electricity Authority v Pitt ; Minister of Transport v Pitt

CITED in

• Consett Iron Company Ltd v Clavering Trustees
• Canadian Electrical Association v Canadian National Railways
• Jamaica Public Service Company Ltd v Rose Marie Samuels

This document cites

• Central Control Board (Liquor Traffic) v Cannon Brewery Company Ltd
• Roderick v Aston Local Board
• Escott v Newport Corporation
• Shelfer and Another v City of London Electric Lighting Company
• Postmaster-General v Brooks



See all quotations

• The King against The Justices of Middlesex
• Blackpool Corporation v Starr Estate Company
• Edinburgh Street Tramways Company v Torbain
• Metropolitan Water Board v Berton
• London and North Western Railway Company v Evans
• Great Western Railway Company v Swindon and Cheltenham Extension Railway Company
• Re Corporation of Dudley
• Guaranty Trust Company of New York v Hannay & Company
• British Columbia Electric Railway Company v Stewart