Wellness International Network v. Sharif: Minimizing the Jurisdictional Impact of Stern through Consent of Bankruptcy Litigants

› ›

Author: Ishaq Kundawala

Position: Professor of Law, Shepard Broad College of Law, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. J.D., Tulane Law School; B.A., Austin College. I thank my research assistant, Joseph Kadis, for his invaluable assistance. I also thank the editors of the Capital University Law Review for their good work and professionalism. Last but not...

Pages: 67-101

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Summary

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

Extract

Wellness International Network v. Sharif: Minimizing the Jurisdictional Impact of Stern through Consent of Bankruptcy Litigants

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 600 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2010), 02-56002, In re Marshall
Federal Cases - 458 U.S. 50 (1982), 81-150, Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
Federal Cases - 478 U.S. 833 (1986), 85-621, Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor
Federal Cases - 490 U.S. 858 (1989), 88-5014, Gomez v. United States
Federal Cases - 492 U.S. 33 (1989), 87-1716, Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg

See all quotations