Well, should they? A response to If People Would Be Outraged by Their Rulings, Should Judges Care?

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 478 U.S. 186 (1986), 85-140, Bowers v. Hardwick
• Federal Cases - 523 U.S. 833 (1998), 96-1337, County of Sacramento v. Lewis
• Federal Cases - 531 U.S. 356 (2001), 99-1240, Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett
• Federal Cases - 536 U.S. 304 (2002), 00-8452, Atkins v. Virginia
• Federal Cases - 539 U.S. 558 (2003), 02-102, Lawrence v. Texas



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 543 U.S. 551 (2005), 03-633, Roper v. Simmons
• Federal Cases - 198 U.S. 45 (1906), 292, Lochner v. New York
• Federal Cases - 304 U.S. 144 (1938), 640, United States v. Carolene Products Co.
• Federal Cases - 60 U.S. 393 (1857), Dred Scott v. Sandford
• Federal Cases - 323 U.S. 214 (1944), 22, Korematsu v. United States
• Federal Cases - 342 U.S. 165 (1952), 83, Rochin v. California
• Federal Cases - 347 U.S. 483 (1954), 1, 2, 4, 10., Brown v. Board of Ed. of Topeka, Shawnee County, Kan.
• Federal Cases - 381 U.S. 479 (1965), 496, Griswold v. Connecticut
• Federal Cases - 410 U.S. 113 (1973), 70-18, Roe v. Wade
• Massachusetts - 440 Mass. 309 (2003), SJC-08860, Goodridge v. Department of Public Health