Warwick Rural District Council v Miller-Mead; Miller-Mead v Warwick Rural District Council

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Danish Mercantile Company Ltd v Beaumont
• St. Leonard's Vestry v Holmes
• R v Chapman, ex parte Arlidge

[See more]

• Firth v Staines
• Bowyer, Philpott & Payne Ltd v Mather
• Boston Deep Sea Fishing & Ice Company Ltd v Farnham
• Public Health Act 1936 - Articles : S-100
• Local Government Act 1933 - Articles : S-32
• Public Health Act 1875 - Articles : S-107
• Public Health Act 1936 - Articles : S-93
• Public Health Act 1936 - Articles : S-94
• Local Government Act 1933 - Articles : SCH-3
• Public Health Act 1875 - Articles : S-259
• Local Government Act 1933 - Articles : S-276

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Warwick Rural District Council v Miller-Mead; Miller-Mead v Warwick Rural District Council

CONSIDERS

• Bowyer, Philpott & Payne Ltd v Mather

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1962] 1 All ER 212
• 60 LGR 29
• [1962] 126 JP 143

[See more]

• [1962] 2 WLR 284
• [1962] CH 441

REFERRED in

• Poppett's (Caterers) Ltd v Maidenhead Corporation
• Attorney General v Foley

CONSIDERED in

• Poppett's (Caterers) Ltd v Maidenhead Corporation

APPLIED in

• Stoke-on-Trent City Council v B & Q (Retail) Ltd

This document cites

• Bowyer, Philpott & Payne Ltd v Mather
• St. Leonard's Vestry v Holmes
• R v Chapman, ex parte Arlidge
• Boston Deep Sea Fishing & Ice Company Ltd v Farnham
• Bowyer, Philpott & Payne Ltd v Mather



See all quotations

• Firth v Staines
• Danish Mercantile Company Ltd v Beaumont
• Public Health Act 1875
• Public Health (London) Act 1891
• Local Government Act 1933
• Public Health Act 1936
• Metropolis Management Act 1855