Warren Brent Landsman v R

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Criminal Justice Act 2003

CITES

• Elias v DPP (NSW)
• Lavorato v R
• R v Pitts (No 1)

[See more]

• X7 v Australian Crime Commission
• Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission
• Warren Brent Landsman v District Court of New South Wales
• R v TDP
• Hammond v R
• R v FE
• Lee v The Queen
• Thomas v R
• Mcdermott v R
• R v Lee
• Mraz v (No 1)
• Rice v Connolly
• Andrews v R
• Reid v The Queen
• Hope v Bathurst City Council
• Sorby v Commonwealth
• DPP (Nauru) v Fowler
• Gerakiteys v R
• King v R
• Williams v R
• Mickelberg v R
• Dietrich v R
• Coco v R
• Rogers v R
• Vetter v Lake Macquarie City Council
• R v Bikic
• R v Zamagias
• Bhp Billiton Ltd v Schultz
• D'orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
• Weiss v R
• Charara v The Queen
• R v Dunlop
• R v Taufahema
• R v Miell (Richard Andrew)
• Cesan v The Queen
• Talay v R

CONSIDERED in

• The Queen(Crown) v SM (Offender)
• The Queen(Crown) v Frank John Fischetti (Offender)
• R v Poynton (No. 3)

[See more]

• Gamage v Riashi and Another
• Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Duggan
• DPP (Cth) v Knopp (a pseudonym) and Another
• R v Mehajer
• JP v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
• Application by Paul Scott Howes pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)
• Forrest v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
• Franklin v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
• Shapkin v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2)

CITED in

• Ag v DPP (Nsw)
• Shaun Stewart McNeil v R
• Andrew Woodhouse v DPP (NSW)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2014] NSWCCA 328

This document cites

• Cesan v The Queen
• R v Bikic
• Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission
• D'orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
• Lee v The Queen



See all quotations

• Bhp Billiton Ltd v Schultz
• Charara v The Queen
• Weiss v R
• R v TDP
• R v FE
• Lavorato v R
• R v Pitts (No 1)
• Hammond v R
• R v Dunlop
• Warren Brent Landsman v District Court of New South Wales
• Talay v R
• X7 v Australian Crime Commission
• Elias v DPP (NSW)
• Vetter v Lake Macquarie City Council
• R v Miell (Richard Andrew)
• R v Taufahema
• R v Zamagias
• R v De-Cressac
• Reid v The Queen
• Rice v Connolly
• Hope v Bathurst City Council
• Sorby v Commonwealth
• Gerakiteys v R
• DPP (Nauru) v Fowler
• King v R
• Williams v R
• Mickelberg v R
• Dietrich v R
• Coco v R
• Rogers v R