Walsh v Holst & Company Ltd

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Barkway v South Wales Transport Company Ltd

REFERS TO

• Woods v Duncan
• Cassidy v Ministry of Health
• Pickard v Smith

[See more]

• Tarry v Ashton
• Mint v Good
• Scott v the London and St Katherine Docks Company

APPLIES

• Penny v Wimbledon Urban District Council
• Maxwell v British Thomson-Houston Company
• Byrne v Boadle

DISTINGUISHES

• Moore v R Fox & Sons

CONSIDERED in

• Gahagan, James v Taylor Bros (Slipway & Engineering) Pty Ltd
• Malabre v Gordon
• Kohanian v Carnival Crystal Palace Resort and Casino

REFERRED in

• Lim Gim Seah v Lokman bin Talib

FOLLOWED in

• MA Clyde v Wong Ah Mei and Another
• Ludgate v Lovett

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1958] 3 All ER 33
• [1958] 1 WLR 800

CITED in

• East Demerara Water Conservancy Board v Saliman and Others and; East Demerara Water Conservancy Board v Ivan Samaroo and Others

DISTINGUISHED in

• Salsbury v Woodland

This document cites

---

• Moore v R Fox & Sons
• Woods v Duncan
• Cassidy v Ministry of Health
• Mint v Good
• Byrne v Boadle



See all quotations

• Penny v Wimbledon Urban District Council
• Maxwell v British Thomson-Houston Company
• Scott v the London and St Katherine Docks Company
• Tarry v Ashton
• Pickard v Smith
• Barkway v South Wales Transport Company Ltd