Wall v Collins and another

Core Citations

---

GRANTS PERMISSION TO APPEAL

• Wall v Collins and another

CONSIDERS

• Massey v Boulden

REFERS TO

• Harris v Flower
• Peacock and another v Custins and another
• International Tea Stores Company v Hobbs

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Wall v Collins and another

APPLIES

• Kent and Another v Kavanagh and Another

CONSIDERS

• Lewis v Meredith
• Graham v Philcox
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-62

[See more]

• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-185
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Conveyancing Act 1881 - Articles : S-6
• Leasehold Reform Act 1967
• Leasehold Reform Act 1967 - Articles : S-10

DISTINGUISHES

• Rymer v McIlroy
• Golden Lion Hotel (Hunstanton) Ltd v Carter
• Birmingham Joint Stock Company v Lea

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2008] 1 All ER 122
• [2007] 3 WLR 459
• [2007] CH 390

REFERRED in

• Alan Eric Campbell & Maureen Campbell v William Thomas Banks and Others
• Clare Elizabeth Annetts v Nureni Adetunji Adeleye
• Pall Mall 3 Ltd v Network Rail

CONSIDERED in

• Wall v Collins
• Ahmed Mahmood Hassan Said El-Tawil v The Comptroller General of Patents
• Wall v Collins and another

[See more]

• Ellen Mary Alford (Claimant/Appellant) v Anthony Peter Broadribb Hannaford and Another (Defendants/Respondent)
• Pall Mall 3 Ltd v Network Rail

This document cites

---

• Wall v Collins and another
• Graham v Philcox
• Massey v Boulden
• Kent and Another v Kavanagh and Another
• International Tea Stores Company v Hobbs



See all quotations

• Harris v Flower
• Lewis v Meredith
• Peacock and another v Custins and another
• Rymer v McIlroy
• Birmingham Joint Stock Company v Lea
• Golden Lion Hotel (Hunstanton) Ltd v Carter
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Conveyancing Act 1881
• Leasehold Reform Act 1967