Walker and Another v The Queen ; Douglas v The Queen ; Glanville v The Queen

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Judicial Committee Act 1844
• Judicial Committee Act 1833 - Articles : S-III
• Judicial Committee Act 1833 - Articles : S-IV

DISTINGUISHES

• Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor

REFERS TO

• Judgment Nº CCPR/C/35/D/210/1986 from United Nations of Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner, 06-04-1989
• Re the Nawab of Surat

APPLIES

• Thomas v The Queen
• Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [04/11/1993] TLR 1
• [1993] 4 All ER 789
• [1994] 2 AC 36

[See more]

• [1993] 3 WLR 1017

CONSIDERED in

• The Attorney General v Financial Investment & Consultancy Services Ltd
• Taylor (Norris) v R
• R v Barlow

[See more]

• The Attorney General of Grenada v Financial Investment & Consultancy Services Ltd
• Marie and Others v Electoral Commissioner and Others
• Alcedo Tyson v The Queen
• John Robert Barlow v The Queen
• The Superintendent of HM Foxhill Prison and The Government of the United States of America v Viktor Kozeny
• Bowe v The Queen; Davis v The Queen
• Bowe and another v The Queen
• Alcedo Tyson v The Queen
• Bowe v The Queen; Davis v The Queen
• Richard Morrison v The Minister of Justice

CITED in

• R v Madden (Brittan)
• Ruddock v Vadarlis and Others
• Hunte and Khan v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)

APPLIED in

• De Morgan v Director-General of Social Welfare
• Ramdeen v The State

REFERRED in

• Attorney General for Saint Christopher and Nevis v Rodionov

This document cites

• Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor
• Re the Nawab of Surat
• Thomas v The Queen
• Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel
• Judicial Committee Act 1844



See all quotations

• Judicial Committee Act 1833
• Judgment Nº CCPR/C/35/D/210/1986 from United Nations of Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner, 06-04-1989